OVERLAP: PA Wright's campaign for the New England Park was supported by Roy Vincent, who led the campaign for Dorrigo. Both are case studies for activism. This is the third in a short series on the early days of the Dorrigo National Park.
In researching the
history of the Dorrigo National Park I looked at the history of the New England
National Park. This deserves a separate story, but I was struck by the way in
which the same issues and indeed the same people were involved in the fight for
both parks.
In both cases, you had
a small number of locals who were prepared to fight to bring the park about.
In both cases, you had
local members of Parliament who provided top cover and were prepared to
cooperate across electorates to achieve common dreams, the creation of
facilities for the North for the benefit of all. They did so despite some local
opposition.
In both cases, you had
local newspapers that were prepared to support action. I suspect that this was
particularly important in Dorrigo where the Don
Dorrigo Gazette was edited by Roy Vincent’s brother Reginald.
In both cases, you had
common problems that had to be resolved to protect the parks from alienation
and to fund development.
In 1923, Roy Vincent
as local member had blocked attempts to alienate the Dorrigo Reserves, but he
still faced all the problems I have talked about.
In 1927, Vincent tried
to have the Dorrigo Mountain Reserves declared a National Park to protect it
from alienation.
He was advised that
there was no provision to allow this. However, the reserves were declared a
fauna as well flora reserve. This, the Minister advised, meant that changes to
boundaries would require approval of both houses of the state parliament, thus
providing the same protection afforded to the Royal National Park and
Ku-ring-gai Chase.
This was
unsatisfactory.
As local Armidale
state parliamentarian and Vincent’s friend David Drummond later recorded in the
context of the New England National Park, it was just too easy to bring in
administrative changes in the final days of a parliamentary session when tired
MPs could rubber stamp a change without realizing the implications. Legislation
was required that would then force specific legislative action to amend to alienate
land.
I haven’t traced
through all the history here, but it would be 1967 before specific National
Parks legislation was passed through the NSW Parliament by the then Lewis
Liberal-Country Party Government.
Meantime, Vincent and the other Park supporters had other problems to deal with.
Meantime, Vincent and the other Park supporters had other problems to deal with.
Note to readers: This post appeared as a column in the Armidale Express Extra on 11 December 2019. I am repeating the columns here with a lag because they are not all on line outside subscription. You can see all the Belshaw World and History Revisited/History Matters columns by clicking here for 2009, here for 2010, here for 2011, here for 2012, here for 2013, here for 2014, here for 2015, here for 2016, here 2017, here 2018, here 2019
No comments:
Post a Comment