Aboriginal settlement of Sahul: by 40,000 years ago, the ancestors of Australias Aboriginal peoples had occupied the entire continent known as Sahul. This is the third in a series on the Aboriginal peopling of New England drawn from the introductory course I have been running on New England's history.
If the ancestors of
Australia’s Aboriginal peoples reached the large continent known as Sahul
perhaps 65,000 years ago, how and when did they reach the broader New England?
To start answering
this question, consider the illustration to this column from Alana Coper et al.
It shows the land boundaries of the mega-continent of Sahul during the Last
Glacial maximum when sea levels were much lower.
The red lines suggest possible settlement
paths; the black dates archaeological dates where kya stands for a thousand
years. Ignore the other elements.
The Aboriginal
ancestors arrived in Sahul during the Pleistocene, a period of repeated ice
ages broken by warmer periods. They arrived at a benign time with relatively
comfortable temperatures and a higher rainfall sufficient to fill the lakes and
rivers.
The archeological
dates shown in black suggest that by 40,000 years ago the descendents of those
first settlers had occupied the entire continent of Sahul from Papua and
surrounding islands in the north to Tasmania in the far south.
The migration paths
are subject to some dispute. One school of thought is that migration went down
the east coast.
I disagree. I think
that it is most likely that migration proceeded down the western slopes and
immediate western plains where there was water and easier immigration paths.
Whatever the exact
path, it seems clear that by 40,000 years ago Sahul was occupied. Herein lies a
problem, for the dates we have for the broader New England are all later.
The Cuddie Springs site near Brewarrina
suggests occupation as long ago as 35,000 years BP. However, dates here have
been subject to considerable dispute.
Excluding Cuddie Springs, we have a date of
greater than 20,200 years BP (Before Present) from a hearth at Glennies Creek
35 kilometres north of Branxton in the Hunter, while a site on a former terrace
of Wollombi Brook near Singleton suggested a date range of 18,000-30,000 years
BP. At Moffats Swamp near Raymond Terrace, a date of 17,000 years BP was obtained.
On the Liverpool Plains, Aboriginal
occupation has been dated to at least 19,000 years BP. Further north in
South-East Queensland, the Wallen Wallen Creek site on what is now North
Stradbroke Island shows continuous occupation from about 20,000 years ago.
While these dates are
all later, Aboriginal peoples moving south must have passed through the broader
New England, so we can reasonably assume some Aboriginal occupation by at least
40,000 years ago, probably earlier.
In my next column, I will discuss what that occupation might have looked like.
Note to readers: This post appeared as a column in the Armidale Express Extra on 8 April 2020. I am repeating the columns here with a lag because they are not all on line outside subscription. You can see all the Belshaw World and History Revisited/History Matters columns by clicking here for 2009, here for 2010, here for 2011, here for 2012, here for 2013, here for 2014, here for 2015, here for 2016, here 2017, here 2018, here 2019, here 2020
3 comments:
There has been a paper published in February Jim on the dating and identity of locked vegetable remains from Mandjebebe.
It’s the earliest known evidence for the processing and cooking of vegetables outside Africa. Australia has so many firsts and earliest seas quality research continues.to open up the pages of our human history.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-14723-0
The first Australian plant foods at Madjedbebe, 65,000–53,000 years ago
Good morning and thank you John. Very interesting. I'n not sure that I ever shared the idea that early hominins were purely carnivorous as opposed to omnivorous. It seems hard to believe that they might not try readily available fruit or vegetable products especially if hungry. Complex processing may have come later through trial and error.
Pleased you were able to translate the comment Jim, I’m sure what you see wasn’t what was typed. I believe Homo spp. always omnivorous and a significant contributor to their success as a genus. This evidence tells us that the very early arrivals in Sahul brought food processing with them, they were far more than simple harvesters of Nature’s bounty. I attended a series of lectures many years ago now and realised to my own satisfaction that the first human cultivators were female.
Post a Comment