Discussions on the history and historiography of Australia's New England

Wednesday, January 23, 2019

Australia ventures into foreign policy - and spies


Raising the flag, Port Moresby 1883: This action by Queensland set the initial framework for both Australian foreign policy and its espionage activities. This is the first in a new series on Australia's early intelligence activities. 

In this new short series of columns I am going to take you into the world of Australia’s early spies, well before ASIO, ASIS and the alphabet soup of this country’s multifarious intelligence agencies.

In a way, Wednesday 4 April 1883 provides a useful entry point to our story. On that day, Henry Chester, the Police Magistrate on Thursday Island, raised the flag at Port Moresby to formally annex New Guinea and adjacent islands in the name of the British Empire.

Chester was acting on the instructions of the Queensland Premier, Sir Thomas McIlwraith.

The Australian colonies had been concerned for some time about the expansion of German power in the Pacific. They had asked the central Government to annex New Guinea, but also refused to pay any of the costs. In 1876, London declined.

Frustrated, McIlwraith. decide to act unilaterally.  

The British government repudiated the action. However, after the Australian colonies agreed to provide financial support, the British Government made the territory a British protectorate the following year.

Agreement was also reached between the Netherlands, Germany and Britain defining a key dividing boundary.

West Papua became a Dutch colony. The north eastern portion of the island became German New Guinea, the south eastern portion became British New Guinea, later Papua. Four years later, in 1888, Britain formally annexed the territory along with some adjacent islands.

In 1902, authority over Papua was effectively transferred to the new Australian Federation. With the passage of the Papua Act of 1905, the area was officially renamed the Territory of Papua, with Australia assuming formal control in 1906.

This simple tale provides the basis framework for understanding both Australian foreign policy and the emergence of Australia’s intelligence activities.

To the Imperial Government in London trying to balance costs and. imperial economic and political interests at time of growing competition between rising empires including that of the United States, the acquisition of new, distant and potentially costly territories was a low priority.

The self-governing Australian colonies and then the new Commonwealth of Australia were well aware of the imperial position, but took a different view.

While loyal to the Empire, they saw the South Pacific as their economic and political territory, wishing to establish a hegemony similar to that asserted by the Unites States over the Americas with the 1823 Munroe Doctrine. They were also concerned at the growing influence of other rival empires in the Pacific that threatened this dream. 

The end result was the early emergence of a quite distinct if parochial Australian foreign policy. 
Note to readers: This post appeared as a column in the Armidale Express Extra on 16 January 2019. I am repeating the columns here with a lag because they are not all on line outside subscription. You can see all the Belshaw World and History Revisited/History Matters columns by clicking here for 2009, here for 2010, here for 2011, here for 2012, here for 2013, here for 2014, here for 2015, here for 2016, here  2017here 2018, here 2019  

2 comments:

Johnb said...

plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose flashed through my mind Jim.
Impressed by Sir Thomas McIlwraith taking the initiative to try to force the issue.
He saw an Australian strategic interest before Federation that wasn’t perceived at all in London, the seat of Empire but then he was an Ayrshire man.
The Australian Dictionary of Biography concludes:-
Although McIlwraith's economic ideas grew with experience they remained remarkably consistent throughout his career but by the 1890s they made him almost an anachronism. In 1918 T. A. Coghlan wrote that by 1893 the peculiar liberalism of Griffith had expunged any impression made by McIlwraith. Francis Adams saw him as 'the only public man in Australia who, by any stretch of imagination, one could call great'. More practical, Sir William MacGregor saw him as 'an able bully with a face like a dugong and a temper like a buffalo'. Nevertheless McIlwraith certainly had a vision of Queensland outrivalling her neighbours and a grand political style appropriate to his physical stature.

Jim Belshaw said...

Hi John. That's a lovely description by MacGregor. he was a buffalo of a man!