Discussions on the history and historiography of Australia's New England

Monday, December 02, 2019

A VC in turbulent times


Dealing with turbulence: Sir Zelman Cowen as Queensland University Vice Chancellor.This is the third in a three part series on the life of Sir Zelman Cowen. 
In my last column I said that while Zelman Cowen’s public activities as the University of New England’s second VC did increase the public prominence of the university, his internal influence as VC is more difficult to measure.

In his history of UNE, Mathew Jordan mentions two areas where Cowen’s influence was important.

The first was the establishment in 1969 of a separate Faculty of Education. The second was his support for the establishment of a Faculty of Natural Resources. The Commonwealth would not agree for financial reasons, but agreed to the establishment of a School of Natural Resources finally established in 1971 after Cowen’s departure. 

Both were important initiatives: the Faculty of Education was the first in New South Wales, while the School of Natural Resources was the first such institution in Australia. Both attracted students and funding.

There was a third more problematic area, adult education, which Jordoa ignores. This is an odd gap in his history. He makes great play of the establishment of adult education and then, somehow, it disappears.   

First Belshaw as Acting Warden and then Madgwick had placed emphasis on adult education. It fitted with their personal philosophies and was an important element in the Northern outreach that had been so strongly emphasized by New England’s founders.

By the mid 1960s, university extension was a critical element in the University’s integration with its regional communities, while its summer schools such as the School of Dance, a school now seen as one of the seminal influences in the history of Australian dance, had achieved national prominence. Then, somehow, it largely stopped.

John Ryan’s PhD thesis draws out some of the complexities associated with the decline of adult education.

There were internal university problems, as well as funding issues linked to changing Australian Government policies. The loss of the sense of Northerness following the narrow loss of the 1967 self government plebiscite did not help.

Zelman’s role in the decline is unclear.

He was supportive of the role of adult education, but he had to balance that with changing attitudes at Commonwealth level and the reactions within the University to increased funding constraints. I also think that he did not share the original vision of the University as a Northern institution, as well as a national and international institution.

In 1970, Zelman left New England to become VC at the University of Queensland, a post he held until becoming Governor General in 1977 after Sir John Kerr.

In both roles he had to deal with turbulence, with political and social change. He did so with a focus on rational argument, the gathering of evidence and with a grace and tact that have justly given him a place in Australian history.
Note to readers: This post appeared as a column in the Armidale Express Extra on 20 November 2019. I am repeating the columns here with a lag because they are not all on line outside subscription. You can see all the Belshaw World and History Revisited/History Matters columns by clicking here for 2009, here for 2010, here for 2011, here for 2012, here for 2013, here for 2014, here for 2015,  here for 2016, here  2017here 2018, here 2019  

4 comments:

Johnb said...

Quote ‘ had placed emphasis on adult education. It fitted with their personal philosophies and was an important element in the Northern outreach that had been so strongly emphasized by New England’s founders.’
My judgement Jim is that Zelman Cowan wasn’t a ‘man of Place’ but a ‘man of Intellect’. I very much doubt that sustaining the university as the intellectual centre serving a Northern Regional identity.was within the remit of his appointment.

Jim Belshaw said...

I'm not sure, John. I would be surprised if the remit of his appointment had changed although I guess that the terms of reference would focus on the institution. But Cowen did not have the regional/global/academy focus of Booth, Belshaw or Madgwick. The year of his arrival is also significant. That's the year the new state plebiscite was lost, a loss that led to the disintegration of the Northern coalition that had been such a driver.

Johnb said...

I had hoped to suggest Jim that because Cowan didn’t have a similar personal philosophy as his predecessors unless such was in his remit he would not have the interest or inclination to sustain that Outreach. My reading of your previous essays left me with a strong impression that those predecessors had a strong sense of both Place and Intellect hence the Outreach and wider involvement in what they saw as their Regional Community.

Jim Belshaw said...

Hi John. I'm sorry that my response was badly phrased I understood you position and agreed with it. You capture the position very well.